Quantcast The Spectator
College Media Network
Spectator Home Spectwitter! Specbook! Site map

Something to talk about

Blugold Commitment offers opportunity for student input

Michael Umhoefer

Issue date: 9/10/09 Section: Editorial/Opinion
  • Print
  • Email

The Blugold Commitment is a proposal from the university to increase tuition. Simply put, it's nothing new. While our reflex, as students, is to perpetually disagree with increasing tuition costs, there is something more than just money at stake here at UW-Eau Claire.

For those of you who don't know, the Blugold Commitment is a proposal which increases our tuition dramatically to provide more faculty, financial aid and invest more into the tuition students control (currently $1.5 million). UW-Madison and La Crosse have successfully implemented similar proposals. Eau Claire's proposal is not set in stone. The administration has proposed an increase between $500 and $1,250 per semester. Yes, the dollar amount is alarming, but what we all should be aware of is the liquidity this proposal still has.

Our administration has brought us an outline of ideas they would like to see implemented. I promise every student it is a skeleton of ideas, not purposely vague in order to conceal their true agenda. This semester is the students' time to append that skeleton. No matter what the administration proposes or puts forth, nothing will be implemented unless it has the support of students and Student Senate.

With that said, there is still a continual debate to be had on our campus. The question in front of us is relatively simple. Do we value the cost of our education or the quality of our education? If your priorities lay with cost, your stance will simply fall against this proposal. If you came to Eau Claire for the quality of our education, then think of this proposal as more than just a tuition hike.

Eau Claire has lost $33.5 million dollars of state revenue in the last seven years. If you add on the additional $12.7 million we will lose in this year and next, our university will receive over $46 million dollars less from the state. Even in economically prosperous times of the early 2000s, we received less money than in previous years. To any business or economics professor this business model to remain dependent on state funds, is simply not sustainable. The trend is, and will continue to be, to receive less and less from the state. Our only other financial source now lies within tuition from the students and donations from our alumni.

Is it our responsibility to pick up the tab left by the state? Or is it our responsibility to maintain the level of education that made us choose Eau Claire? Soon we will not be able to maintain the services we currently provide. I am not talking about subsidiary services, rather, I mean majors and departments that will have to be cut or removed. It is impossible for us to keep what we have and expect the educational quality to remain the same without additional revenue.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think CASE’s programs are effective in reducing binge drinking?
Submit Vote

View Results

Featured Media

"Do I Look Illegal?"

Media credit: Taylor Kuether

Many UW-Eau Claire students contributed to the "Do I Look Illegal?" protest, hosted by the UWEC College Democrats, which took place all day Wednesday.

To view more videos from The Spectator, visit our YouTube channel.

Follow us on Twitter

Advertisement