Quantcast The Spectator
College Media Network
Spectator Home Spectwitter! Specbook! Site map

Tuition hike plan missing specifics

The Spectator staff

Issue date: 9/3/09 Section: Editorial/Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1

For all of the university's employees and especially its students, maintaining academic excellence is obviously top priority. However, the "Blugold Commitment" also begs the question of just how much students are willing - or able - to pay for higher education.

Part of the plan, introduced by Chancellor Brian Levin-Stankevich last week, would hire more professors, in turn improving course availability to help students graduate in four years.

The goal increase is between $1,000 and $2,500 a year. If approved, increases would start in small increments of a minimum $250 a year and move to $500 the next year and so on. However, the exact numbers are still anyone's guess, and therein lies the problem.

It is hard to shoot down or support the proposal without knowing exactly what the plan would bring to the campus, especially when the high estimates are more than double the low estimates. It is hard to determine whether a hefty monetary sacrifice by students will be worthwhile without knowing which departments will get what share of the new faculty and exactly how much it will help students graduate on time. We need the administration to be open and transparent with the decision-making process now and until the "Blugold Commitment" lands on the regents' desks.

We also encourage the administration to take a closer look at excess spending throughout the university and consider other options before putting many students into deeper financial crisis. Before jacking up tuition, an alternative might be to offer more summer and winterim classes if getting students out in four years is really the issue.

We feel that most students, who take the initiative to plan ahead, can easily graduate in four years. We also don't feel it is too much to ask to have more professors teaching during the summer and on winter break to improve the percentage of students who graduate in four years (26 percent). Amid $8 million in cuts in state aid, more sacrifices are going to have to be made.

The fact that more money would be available for financial aid and scholarships under the plan eases the pain for those who would be eligible. But even so, that is little consolation to many who already cringe at the thought of graduating and having to pay back tens of thousands of dollars in loans.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Rationality

posted 9/03/09 @ 8:46 AM CST

to play devils advocate:

Wouldn't increasing the amount of classes taught over the summer and winter break also cost money? After all professors do have to get payed, they are not going to just magically teach summer courses for free because you ask them to. (Continued…)

bobby

posted 9/03/09 @ 8:56 AM CST

Great point. As an alumni and current professor at another Univ. there is more to it than just adding more classes. Some summer courses actually cost the university more money in faculty salary, lab costs, etc. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think it is appropriate to use Native American mascots?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement