Quantcast The Spectator
College Media Network
Spectator Home Spectwitter! Specbook! Site map

No prayer hatin'

Poultry company right to allow breaks for religous acts

Spectator Staff

Issue date: 9/15/08 Section: Editorial/Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
A St. Cloud-based poultry company isn't exactly chicken when it comes to accommodating diversity.

According to a Sep. 10 Associated Press article, Gold'n Plump Poultry Inc. has agreed to allow nine Somali Islamic workers at its plants to take short prayer breaks and refuse to handle pork products in response to a 2006 class-action lawsuit.

In the suit, the workers accused Work Connection, an employment agency, of requiring Islamic applicants to sign a "pork acknowledgement form" in which they agreed to handle pork. It is alleged in the complaint that the workers who did not sign the document were not hired. Work Connection denies the allegations, but has reached a settlement with some of the employees for an undisclosed amount of money while other workers may receive new employment offers at Gold'n Plump.

The company's new policy is an appropriate response to the initial complaint against the company. With so many companies accommodating Christianity by giving days off to celebrate holidays, it is only fitting the same accommodations are made for other religions.

As Islam is a rising religion - and considering our current political state - the new policy sends a message that America is slowly but surely becoming more tolerant of different cultures and religious affiliations. Hopefully Gold'n Plump's action will influence other countries to adopt similar policies.

In doing this, the door would be open for cultural toleration on the part of the employees. Working with those who are now protected under the policy could help to educate a large quantity of people about the misconception of other religions and other nationalities, and also bring an understanding between them.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3

dan

posted 9/15/08 @ 12:16 PM CST

If Muslim workers can refuse to handle pork witohut gettinig fired, can Catholic pharmicists refuse to dispense Plan B pills without getting fired?

Nope, tolerance remains a one way street. (Continued…)

Ernie

posted 9/15/08 @ 7:11 PM CST

The burning question here is: Why would someone whose religion forbids them to handle pork apply for a job in a place where they may be required to handle pork? This smacks of opportunism and we are seeing more of that schools, universities and places of employment. (Continued…)

Travis

posted 9/18/08 @ 7:45 AM CST

Perhaps the Somalis who work in these places (like the local ones in Barron and Arcadia) do so because these plants are in the communities where their families have settled! Since they are large companies, there is a better chance they have better anti-discrimination policies that local busineeses, thus are more friendly to work for. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think CASE’s programs are effective in reducing binge drinking?
Submit Vote

View Results

Featured Media

"Do I Look Illegal?"

Media credit: Taylor Kuether

Many UW-Eau Claire students contributed to the "Do I Look Illegal?" protest, hosted by the UWEC College Democrats, which took place all day Wednesday.

To view more videos from The Spectator, visit our YouTube channel.

Follow us on Twitter

Advertisement